Trophic Cascades

What Is a Trophic Cascade?

A trophic cascade is a chain of direct and indirect effects that moves through multiple trophic levels of an ecosystem. The original change may occur in one population, but the consequences can appear in populations several feeding levels away.

A classic example begins with a predator. If predator abundance increases, predation pressure on its prey may increase. If the prey are herbivores, fewer herbivores can mean less grazing on producers. Plant biomass may then increase, creating another change in the community.

How Effects Move Through Trophic Levels

Trophic levels describe feeding positions within an ecosystem. Producers form the base of most food chains, followed by primary consumers, secondary consumers, and higher-level consumers. Because organisms at different levels are connected by feeding relationships, changes at one level can influence another.

Consider the pattern predator increases → herbivores decrease → producers increase. The predator directly affects the herbivores through predation. The producer response is indirect because the predator does not need to eat the plants for the plants to be affected.

Predator-Driven Cascades

Predator-driven trophic cascades occur when changes in predator abundance or behavior affect prey and then cause additional changes at lower trophic levels. Increasing predator pressure can reduce prey abundance. When those prey are herbivores, reduced grazing can allow producers to increase.

The reverse can also occur. If a predator is removed, its prey may increase. If those prey consume producers, plant abundance or biomass may decline. This is why predator removal can sometimes produce ecological changes that seem surprising at first.

Herbivore-Driven Cascades

Not every cascade has to begin with a predator. A major change in herbivore abundance can affect producers and then influence other organisms that depend on those producers for food or habitat.

If herbivore abundance rises, plants may experience increased grazing and decline. A reduction in vegetation can affect insects, birds, decomposers, soil conditions, and other organisms. In this case, the initial change at the herbivore level produces effects at lower and potentially adjacent parts of the food web.

Real ecosystems are more complicated than a single straight chain. A food web contains many overlapping interactions, so the final result of a population change can depend on which species are connected and how strongly they interact.

Direct and Indirect Effects

A direct effect occurs when one species immediately affects another through an interaction such as predation, herbivory, or competition. An indirect effect occurs when one species changes another species through its effect on a third population.

Trophic cascades are especially useful for understanding indirect effects. A predator directly affects its prey, but the predator may indirectly affect plants because the prey consumes those plants.

Keystone Species and Trophic Cascades

A keystone species can be an important driver of a trophic cascade. If a keystone predator has a disproportionately large effect on its prey, removing that predator may cause changes that propagate through multiple trophic levels.

The terms are related, but they describe different ideas. Keystone species refers to the ecological role of a species with an unusually large community effect. Trophic cascade refers to the chain of effects moving through trophic levels.

Why Trophic Cascades Matter

Trophic cascades help ecologists understand why changing one population can have consequences far beyond that population. They are relevant to predator removal, species reintroduction, overhunting, invasive species, habitat changes, and conservation decisions.

They also show why ecosystems cannot always be managed by looking at species independently. A population may play an important role in controlling another population, which then controls a third. Changing one part of the network can therefore change the conditions experienced by many other organisms.

At the same time, scientists should not assume that every ecosystem will produce the same cascade. Competition, disease, climate, resource availability, behavior, and other interactions can weaken, strengthen, or alter the predicted pattern.

Common Misconceptions

If You See This on a Test, Think This

Quick Practice